FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-30-2003, 11:34 PM   #1
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: mich
Posts: 9
Default Can life be broken down into math?

A question that I've always kind of turned around in my mind from time to time was the thought that life can be broken down into a mathematical equation. This is sort of explored in the movie "Pi" if you've seen it, though that's not what sparked my interest in the topic.

Think about it: Every action you make during the day has multiple factors contributing to that effect. You could list many, many things, but I think the four biggest subjects you can lump it into is personal history, immediate history, current mood and current environment. There has to be SOME kind of pattern existing within these. If there wasn't how could we predict people's actions? It's just a neverending string of math. Sorry I can't literate as much as I'd like on this topic, it's pretty late. I'll save it for the discussion, if one follows. Heh.
anti is offline  
Old 05-30-2003, 11:39 PM   #2
Regular Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 127
Default

I hope we're not talking blatant mathmatical relationships here.

Because if we are allow me to throw my bookshelves out the window before we begin discussing.
Gnomelord is offline  
Old 05-31-2003, 04:45 AM   #3
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,969
Default

Don't know much about chaos theory, though my degree is in applied math. Never took the course. I think, however, that what you're talking about would fall within the realm of nonlinear mathematics. As such, we could make predictions about large systems over long term, or even make reasonable assumptions about individuals or local systems over the short term, but nothing definitive.
Something I've always wondered, along these lines:
If someone came up with a mathematical model which precisely described the behavior of the stock market, would the existence of the model introduce a variable making the model useless, even if the developer never told anyone else? Or would the existence of the model have to be leaked in order for the model to see itself as a variable?

Ed
nermal is offline  
Old 05-31-2003, 07:37 AM   #4
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Gainesville, FL
Posts: 1,827
Default

Well, in the sense that life is a system of organized chemical reactions, then yes it can be. Because the reactions are governed ultimately by the rules of quantum mechanics. Hence the Schrodinger equation describes life, technically speaking.

Unfortunately, nobody currently can solve a three-body problem exactly, much the less a trillion body problem. So the exact details of the solution are unknown.
Feather is offline  
Old 05-31-2003, 04:38 PM   #5
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Hiding from Julian ;)
Posts: 5,368
Default

Actually, someone DID find a general solution to the 3 body problem - takes an astronomical number of terms to produce an actual result though, so it's not really useful.
Corona688 is offline  
Old 06-01-2003, 12:54 AM   #6
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Silver City, New Mexico
Posts: 1,872
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by nermal
Don't know much about chaos theory, though my degree is in applied math. Never took the course. I think, however, that what you're talking about would fall within the realm of nonlinear mathematics. As such, we could make predictions about large systems over long term, or even make reasonable assumptions about individuals or local systems over the short term, but nothing definitive.
Ed
AFAIK, Catastrophe Theory is as close as anyone has come to such a system so far.
wade-w is offline  
Old 06-01-2003, 07:27 AM   #7
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: :noitacoL
Posts: 4,679
Default

I thought Lagrangre solved the three body problem a long time ago.
ex-xian is offline  
Old 06-01-2003, 10:08 AM   #8
Contributor
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 13,389
Default

Your idea has been explored before by Asimov in the Foundation series, under the name psychohistory. I know a physist who is try to model large scale human behavoir with stat mech.

Your question seems to be a different angle on the Turing Test.
AdamWho is offline  
Old 06-02-2003, 07:48 AM   #9
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: springfield, MA. USA
Posts: 2,482
Default simple response to your OP

No. If this categorizes me as some-kina ridiculous Vitalist, guess i"m stuck w/ that. But, NO; you're not going to be able to "reduce" human life to some sort of neat line-or-book of equations. Un-ungh.
abe smith is offline  
Old 06-05-2003, 08:25 PM   #10
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Lubbock, Texas
Posts: 238
Default

Accursed vitalist. I use my great labeling power to name you such!

Keeping in mind that mathematics in science is a language that describes relationships using numbers, I would think that given enough computational power and understanding of physics, one could derive numerical results describing practically every facet of life.

Of course, that's a lot of computational power and understanding, so don't be looking for it any time soon.
Curtis is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:30 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.